基督徒应选择怎样的候选人？ / What Kind of Candidate Should Christians Choose?
2026-08-08补充问题
Additional Question
我的问题
My Question
基督徒是不是应该优先选出支持基督教的候选人？
Should Christians give priority to a candidate who supports Christianity?
是不是应该选出支持宗教自由的候选人？
Should Christians choose a candidate who supports religious freedom?
如果另一位候选人是坚定的伊斯兰教徒，或者信奉其他宗教，基督徒是否可以选他？
If another candidate is a committed Muslim or follows another religion, may Christians vote for that person?
改革宗的简要回答
A Short Reformed Answer
基督徒不应当只看候选人的宗教标签。
Christians should not look only at a candidate’s religious label.
一个自称基督徒的人，不一定诚实、公义、能干，也不一定真正按照圣经治理。
A person who calls himself a Christian may not be honest, just, competent, or governed by biblical principles.
一个不是基督徒的人，也可能在某些公共政策上更尊重公义、秩序、生命和宗教自由。
A non-Christian may, in some public policies, show greater respect for justice, order, life, and religious freedom.
因此，改革宗通常不会说：“只要是基督徒，就必须选他。”
Therefore, Reformed theology normally does not say, “If the candidate is Christian, you must vote for him.”
但是，候选人的信仰也不是完全无关紧要。
However, a candidate’s faith is not completely unimportant.
人的信仰会影响他怎样看待神、人、真理、法律、家庭、公义和政府权力。
A person’s faith affects how he understands God, humanity, truth, law, family, justice, and political power.
第一原则：看果子，不只看标签
First Principle: Examine the Fruit, Not Only the Label
马太福音 7:16–20
Matthew 7:16–20
中文（和合本）
凭着他们的果子，就可以认出他们来。荆棘上岂能摘葡萄呢？蒺藜里岂能摘无花果呢？这样，凡好树都结好果子，惟独坏树结坏果子。好树不能结坏果子；坏树不能结好果子。凡不结好果子的树，就砍下来，丢在火里。所以，凭着他们的果子，就可以认出他们来。
English (ESL)
You will know them by their fruit. People do not gather grapes from thorn bushes or figs from weeds. A good tree produces good fruit, and a bad tree produces bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot produce good fruit. So you will know them by their fruit.
经文解释
Explanation
候选人说自己是基督徒，只是一个声明。
A candidate saying that he is a Christian is only a claim.
基督徒还要观察他的行为、政策、品格、诚实和治理记录。
Christians should also examine his actions, policies, character, honesty, and record of leadership.
如果一个人公开使用基督教语言，却长期撒谎、贪腐、残暴、藐视法律，那么他的宗教标签不能自动证明他适合治理。
If a person uses Christian words but continues in lying, corruption, cruelty, and contempt for law, his religious label does not automatically prove that he is fit to govern.
第二原则：民事官员首先应当维护公义
Second Principle: Civil Rulers Should Uphold Justice
罗马书 13:3–4
Romans 13:3–4
中文（和合本）
作官的原不是叫行善的惧怕，乃是叫作恶的惧怕。你愿意不惧怕掌权的吗？你只要行善，就可得他的称赞；因为他是神的用人，是与你有益的。你若作恶，却当惧怕，因为他不是空空地佩剑；他是神的用人，是伸冤的，刑罚那作恶的。
English (ESL)
Rulers are not supposed to frighten people who do good. They are to restrain people who do evil. A ruler is God’s servant for the public good. He has authority to punish wrongdoing.
经文解释
Explanation
政府的主要职责不是传福音。
The government’s main duty is not to preach the gospel.
政府的职责是维护基本公义、保护人民、惩治犯罪、保存社会秩序。
Its duty is to uphold basic justice, protect people, punish crime, and preserve public order.
因此，判断候选人时，应当认真考虑他是否尊重法律、公义、生命、家庭、财产权和人民的基本自由。
Therefore, when judging a candidate, Christians should consider whether he respects law, justice, life, family, property, and basic human freedoms.
第三原则：宗教自由非常重要
Third Principle: Religious Freedom Is Very Important
支持宗教自由的候选人，通常比想要强迫全国接受某一种宗教的候选人更合适。
A candidate who supports religious freedom is normally preferable to one who wants to force the whole nation to accept one religion.
真正的信心不能靠政府强迫产生。
True faith cannot be produced by government force.
政府可以保护教会自由敬拜、传福音和教导真理。
The government can protect the church’s freedom to worship, preach, and teach the truth.
但政府不能用刀剑使人重生。
But the government cannot use the sword to give people new birth.
约翰福音 18:36
John 18:36
中文（和合本）
耶稣回答说：“我的国不属这世界；我的国若属这世界，我的臣仆必要争战，使我不至于被交给犹太人；只是我的国不属这世界。”
English (ESL)
Jesus said, “My kingdom is not from this world. If My kingdom were from this world, My servants would fight for Me. But My kingdom is not from this world.”
经文解释
Explanation
基督的国不是靠国家强制、军队或行政权力建立的。
Christ’s kingdom is not built by government force, armies, or political power.
基督的国借着圣灵、神的道和福音扩展。
Christ’s kingdom grows through the Holy Spirit, God’s Word, and the gospel.
因此，保护宗教自由并不等于说所有宗教都是真的。
Therefore, protecting religious freedom does not mean that all religions are true.
它只是表示，政府不应强迫人的良心，也不应禁止教会忠心传讲真理。
It means that the government should not force the conscience or forbid the church from faithfully preaching the truth.
第四原则：基督徒候选人若真实可信，通常具有重要优势
Fourth Principle: A Credible Christian Candidate May Have an Important Advantage
如果一位候选人真正敬畏神，并且品格、能力和政策也较好，这当然是很重要的优点。
If a candidate truly fears God and also has good character, competence, and sound policies, this is clearly an important advantage.
出埃及记 18:21
Exodus 18:21
中文（和合本）
并要从百姓中拣选有才能的人，就是敬畏神、诚实无妄、恨不义之财的人，派他们作千夫长、百夫长、五十夫长、十夫长，管理百姓。
English (ESL)
Choose capable people who fear God, who are trustworthy, and who hate dishonest gain. Appoint them as leaders over the people.
经文解释
Explanation
这节经文列出四个重要条件。
This verse gives four important qualifications.
第一，有能力。
First, the person should be capable.
第二，敬畏神。
Second, the person should fear God.
第三，诚实可靠。
Third, the person should be trustworthy.
第四，不贪爱不义之财。
Fourth, the person should hate dishonest gain.
所以，“他是基督徒”并不是唯一条件。
Therefore, “He is a Christian” is not the only qualification.
他还必须有治理能力、诚实、公义和自我约束。
He should also have competence, honesty, justice, and self-control.
第五原则：不应仅因候选人是穆斯林或其他宗教，就自动拒绝
Fifth Principle: A Muslim or Other Non-Christian Candidate Should Not Be Rejected Automatically
基督教与伊斯兰教在神、基督、救恩和圣经真理上有根本冲突。
Christianity and Islam have fundamental disagreements about God, Christ, salvation, and biblical truth.
因此，基督徒不能假装这些宗教差别不重要。
Therefore, Christians must not pretend that these religious differences do not matter.
但是，在民事选举中，问题不只是：“他信什么宗教？”
But in a civil election, the question is not only, “What religion does he follow?”
还要问：“他会怎样治理？”
We must also ask, “How will he govern?”
他是否尊重所有人的宗教自由？
Will he respect religious freedom for everyone?
他是否保护基督徒公开敬拜、传福音和教育儿女的权利？
Will he protect the right of Christians to worship publicly, preach the gospel, and educate their children?
他是否想把伊斯兰教法或其他宗教规范强加给全社会？
Does he want to impose Islamic law or another religious code on the whole society?
他是否尊重法律、宪政秩序和权力限制？
Does he respect law, constitutional order, and limits on political power?
如果一位穆斯林候选人尊重宗教自由、公义和法律，而另一位自称基督徒的候选人腐败、残暴并反对基本自由，基督徒不能只凭标签作决定。
If a Muslim candidate respects religious freedom, justice, and law, while a self-identified Christian candidate is corrupt, cruel, and opposed to basic freedom, Christians should not decide by labels alone.
第六原则：不能为了“支持基督教”而支持不义
Sixth Principle: We Must Not Support Injustice in the Name of Christianity
箴言 17:15
Proverbs 17:15
中文（和合本）
定恶人为义的，定义人为恶的，这都为耶和华所憎恶。
English (ESL)
The Lord hates both of these things: declaring a guilty person innocent and declaring an innocent person guilty.
经文解释
Explanation
一个候选人即使口头支持基督教，也不能因此得到犯罪的特权。
Even if a candidate speaks in support of Christianity, he does not receive permission to act wickedly.
基督徒不能因为他帮助自己的宗教群体，就为他的谎言、暴力、腐败或不公义辩护。
Christians must not excuse his lies, violence, corruption, or injustice merely because he helps their religious group.
这样做不是保护基督教，而是在羞辱基督的名。
Doing this does not protect Christianity; it dishonors the name of Christ.
第七原则：要区分“教会的使命”和“政府的职责”
Seventh Principle: Distinguish the Church’s Mission from the Government’s Duty
教会的使命是传扬福音、施行圣礼、牧养信徒。
The church’s mission is to preach the gospel, administer the sacraments, and shepherd believers.
政府的职责是维护公共秩序和民事公义。
The government’s duty is to preserve public order and civil justice.
所以，我们不应要求一个政治候选人代替牧师和教会。
Therefore, we should not expect a political candidate to replace pastors and the church.
我们也不应因为某人常引用圣经，就自动认为他能成为好官员。
We should not automatically assume that someone will be a good ruler simply because he often quotes the Bible.
可以采用的判断顺序
A Helpful Order for Evaluation
第一，看他是否尊重生命、公义和基本法律秩序。
First, examine whether he respects life, justice, and basic legal order.
第二，看他是否保护宗教自由和良心自由。
Second, examine whether he protects religious freedom and freedom of conscience.
第三，看他是否诚实、廉洁、有能力并且愿意接受权力限制。
Third, examine whether he is honest, free from corruption, competent, and willing to accept limits on power.
第四，看他的实际政策和治理记录，而不只听竞选口号。
Fourth, examine his actual policies and record, not only his campaign words.
第五，再考虑他的信仰是否会帮助或破坏以上这些责任。
Fifth, consider whether his faith will strengthen or weaken these responsibilities.
几种具体情况
Several Practical Situations
情况一
Situation One
一位候选人是真诚的基督徒，也有能力、诚实、公义，并且支持宗教自由。
One candidate is a sincere Christian who is also capable, honest, just, and supportive of religious freedom.
这通常会是一个很有分量的选择。
This would normally be a very strong choice.
情况二
Situation Two
一位候选人自称基督徒，但腐败、撒谎、滥用权力，并且践踏别人的自由。
One candidate calls himself a Christian but is corrupt, dishonest, abusive of power, and willing to violate the freedom of others.
基督徒不应仅因他的宗教身份而支持他。
Christians should not support him merely because of his religious identity.
情况三
Situation Three
一位穆斯林或其他宗教的候选人承诺保护所有人的宗教自由，并且在公义、能力和廉洁方面明显更好。
A Muslim or other non-Christian candidate promises to protect religious freedom for everyone and is clearly stronger in justice, competence, and integrity.
基督徒可以在良心中考虑投票给他。
A Christian may consider voting for that person in good conscience.
但必须认真判断，他是否真正尊重基督徒的自由，而不只是竞选时这样说。
But the Christian should carefully judge whether he truly respects Christian freedom and is not only saying this during the election.
情况四
Situation Four
一位坚定的伊斯兰教候选人希望把伊斯兰宗教法律强加给整个社会，并限制基督徒传福音。
A committed Muslim candidate wants to impose Islamic religious law on the whole society and restrict Christian evangelism.
这种政策与宗教自由和基督徒良心明显冲突。
Such policies clearly conflict with religious freedom and Christian conscience.
基督徒通常不应支持这样的候选人。
Christians ordinarily should not support such a candidate.
改革宗总结
Reformed Summary
基督徒应当优先寻求敬畏神、诚实、有能力、公义并尊重宗教自由的候选人。
Christians should prefer candidates who fear God, are honest, capable, just, and respectful of religious freedom.
但是，不能只因为一个人自称基督徒，就自动投票给他。
But a person should not receive a Christian’s vote automatically merely because he calls himself a Christian.
同样，也不能只因为一个人是穆斯林或信奉其他宗教，就在没有进一步判断的情况下自动拒绝他。
Likewise, a person should not be rejected automatically, without further evaluation, merely because he is Muslim or follows another religion.
真正需要判断的是：他的信仰、品格、政策和行为，会不会促进公义、保护生命、约束邪恶，并保障教会和所有人的合法宗教自由。
The real question is whether his faith, character, policies, and actions will promote justice, protect life, restrain evil, and preserve lawful religious freedom for the church and for all people.
基督徒投票时，不是在选救主。
When Christians vote, they are not choosing a savior.
我们唯一的救主是耶稣基督。
Our only Savior is Jesus Christ.
我们是在一个不完全的世界中，选择一个相对更适合承担民事责任的人。
We are choosing, in an imperfect world, the person who is relatively better suited to carry civil responsibility.